Weekly Regulatory Roundup: Critical Notifications, Circulars & Judicial Developments (9–15 March 2026)

The week ending 15 March 2026 witnessed a substantial volume of regulatory activity spanning income tax enforcement, GST procedural clarifications, customs duty revisions, capital markets regulation, corporate governance, insolvency jurisprudence, and banking prudential norms. This roundup consolidates all significant developments for professionals and assessees seeking to stay current with India's rapidly evolving compliance landscape.


A. Income Tax

AI-Powered Nationwide Survey Exposes Turnover Suppression in Restaurant Sector

The Income Tax Department deployed AI-enabled analytical tools to scrutinise transactional data from establishments in the Food & Beverage sector. A comparison of actual transactional volumes against declared turnover figures exposed widespread under-reporting of income. The nationwide survey exercise, conducted on a preliminary basis, detected suppression of sales aggregating to approximately ₹408 crore.

Investigations revealed that numerous restaurant operators engaged in deliberate deletion of bulk billing records and other systematic modifications designed to deflate actual sales figures. This form of data manipulation allowed significant income to escape tax liability.

  • As part of its voluntary compliance outreach, the Department formally launched the SAKSHAM NUDGE campaign
  • Approximately 63,000 restaurants identified through data analytics were urged to file updated income tax returns
  • Updated returns must be filed under Section 139(8A) of the Income Tax Act 1961 on or before 31st March 2026
  • Non-compliance following this nudge may invite further enforcement action

Important: Assessees in the Food & Beverage sector who have not accurately declared turnover should treat this campaign as a final opportunity to regularise their tax position before enforcement proceedings commence.


HC Sets Aside Provisional Attachment, Reaffirms Need for Tangible Material

Case: ARL Infratech Limited vs DCIT, HC Rajasthan, Judgement Dated 6th March 2026

The Rajasthan High Court intervened to set aside a provisional attachment order targeting the assessee's property. The Court examined the scope and limitations of Section 281B of the Income Tax Act 1961, which empowers the revenue to provisionally attach property during the pendency of proceedings.

The Court held that this power must be exercised with considerable caution and can only be invoked when there is tangible material before the authority substantiating a genuine risk to revenue recovery. A mere apprehension or administrative convenience does not satisfy this standard.

Key principles emerging from the judgement:

  • Provisional attachment under Section 281B cannot be triggered in the absence of concrete evidence suggesting likelihood of tax demand going irrecoverable
  • Where the assessee has maintained a consistent record as a regular taxpayer, this conduct must be factored into the decision
  • Orders that fail to demonstrate application of mind to these criteria are liable to be quashed

B. GST

GSTN Advisory: Linking DRC-03 Voluntary Payments to Demand Orders via DRC-03A

A procedural issue has been flagged for assessees who make voluntary payments using Form GST DRC-03 during investigation or adjudication stages. When such assessees subsequently file an appeal against a demand raised through Form GST DRC-07, the GST portal may still demand full pre-deposit, treating the earlier DRC-03 payment as unrelated.

This happens because payments made through DRC-03 are not automatically linked to the corresponding Demand ID in the Electronic Liability Register.

Steps to resolve this:

  1. File Form GST DRC-03A to manually link the voluntary DRC-03 payment to the relevant demand
  2. Once this linkage is established, the system will recognise the prior payment
  3. The pre-deposit calculation for the appeal will then be adjusted accordingly to reflect the amount already paid

Compliance Note: Assessees who skip this linking step may face incorrect pre-deposit demands or rejection of their appeal filings. Filing DRC-03A promptly after making any voluntary payment is strongly advisable.


HC Rules Retrospective GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Prior SCN Notice

Case: Jordan Enterprises vs Union of India, HC P&H, Judgement Dated 25th February 2026

The Punjab & Haryana High Court delivered a significant ruling on the limits of retrospective cancellation of GST registration. The Court held that GST registration cannot be cancelled with retrospective effect unless the original Show Cause Notice (SCN) explicitly proposed such retrospective action.

The Court observed that cancellation of registration with retrospective effect carries grave civil consequences for a business—it can nullify input tax credit availed by the assessee's customers and trigger cascading compliance disruptions.

Accordingly, the Court laid down the following principles:

  • Any retrospective cancellation must be preceded by a specific proposal to that effect in the SCN
  • A non-speaking order that does not demonstrate proper reasoning or application of mind is legally unsustainable
  • Failing to give the assessee an opportunity to respond to the proposed action constitutes a violation of natural justice

C. Central Excise

No notifications or circulars were issued during the week of 9–15 March 2026.


D. Customs Duty

SBER Bank Included in List 14 for Import Eligibility

Customs Notification 06/2026 Dated 12/03/2026 amends the earlier Notification 45/2025 dated 24th October 2025. A new entry for "SBER Bank" has been inserted into List 14 of Table I.

Key details:

  • Inclusion is effective from 25th June 2025 through 31st March 2026
  • Imports linked to this entry are permissible exclusively for domestic consumption within the specified period

Revised Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Brass Scrap, Areca Nut, Gold and Silver

Customs Notification 25/2026 (NT) Dated 13/03/2026 has notified revised tariff values effective from 14th March 2026. The updated values are:

Commodity Tariff Value
Crude Palm Oil USD 1,112 per metric ton
Gold USD 1,652 per 10 grams
Silver USD 2,820 per kilogram
Areca Nuts USD 7,020 per metric ton

These tariff values form the basis for calculating applicable customs duties on imports and should be factored into landed cost computations by importers dealing in these commodities.


Fee Waiver for Export Document Amendment Due to Force Majeure

Customs Circular 10/2026 Dated 10/03/2026 addresses disruptions in international shipping routes arising from the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Given the resulting logistical complications, exporters may be unable to route cargo to destination ports as originally planned.